Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’. / Eggeling, Kristin Anabel.

In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2023, p. 1342-1358.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Eggeling, KA 2023, 'Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’', Qualitative Research, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1342-1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221096594

APA

Eggeling, K. A. (2023). Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’. Qualitative Research, 23(5), 1342-1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221096594

Vancouver

Eggeling KA. Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’. Qualitative Research. 2023;23(5):1342-1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221096594

Author

Eggeling, Kristin Anabel. / Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’. In: Qualitative Research. 2023 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 1342-1358.

Bibtex

@article{76f128fe2402404fb673e55c0f4b5788,
title = "Embracing the {\textquoteleft}inverted commas{\textquoteright}, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic {\textquoteleft}fieldwork{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Qualitative researchers often refer to the sites they study as a {\textquoteleft}field{\textquoteright} and the work they do there as {\textquoteleft}fieldwork{\textquoteright}. Setting both terms in inverted commas implies that their meaning stretches beyond clean categorisation of places or methods. Taking the example of ethnographic research during the coronavirus pandemic, I argue that embracing this excess meaning opens new research perspectives when fieldwork gets disrupted. As a more hopeful intervention into a debate currently focused on lost access, immobility and professional frustration, this article puts forward alternative readings of {\textquoteleft}fieldwork{\textquoteright} as a relational and emergent process in which proximity and knowledge production are bound to sensitive research practice more than to physical (co)presence. By tragic serendipity, I argue, COVID-19 has the potential to normalise such readings against the traditional gold standard of fieldwork as extended (and often expensive) research stays in places far-away from {\textquoteleft}home{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, fieldwork, ethnography, Covid-19, disruption, serendipity, diplomacy, hope",
author = "Eggeling, {Kristin Anabel}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1177/14687941221096594",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1342--1358",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’

AU - Eggeling, Kristin Anabel

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Qualitative researchers often refer to the sites they study as a ‘field’ and the work they do there as ‘fieldwork’. Setting both terms in inverted commas implies that their meaning stretches beyond clean categorisation of places or methods. Taking the example of ethnographic research during the coronavirus pandemic, I argue that embracing this excess meaning opens new research perspectives when fieldwork gets disrupted. As a more hopeful intervention into a debate currently focused on lost access, immobility and professional frustration, this article puts forward alternative readings of ‘fieldwork’ as a relational and emergent process in which proximity and knowledge production are bound to sensitive research practice more than to physical (co)presence. By tragic serendipity, I argue, COVID-19 has the potential to normalise such readings against the traditional gold standard of fieldwork as extended (and often expensive) research stays in places far-away from ‘home’.

AB - Qualitative researchers often refer to the sites they study as a ‘field’ and the work they do there as ‘fieldwork’. Setting both terms in inverted commas implies that their meaning stretches beyond clean categorisation of places or methods. Taking the example of ethnographic research during the coronavirus pandemic, I argue that embracing this excess meaning opens new research perspectives when fieldwork gets disrupted. As a more hopeful intervention into a debate currently focused on lost access, immobility and professional frustration, this article puts forward alternative readings of ‘fieldwork’ as a relational and emergent process in which proximity and knowledge production are bound to sensitive research practice more than to physical (co)presence. By tragic serendipity, I argue, COVID-19 has the potential to normalise such readings against the traditional gold standard of fieldwork as extended (and often expensive) research stays in places far-away from ‘home’.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - fieldwork

KW - ethnography

KW - Covid-19

KW - disruption

KW - serendipity

KW - diplomacy

KW - hope

U2 - 10.1177/14687941221096594

DO - 10.1177/14687941221096594

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 1342

EP - 1358

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 305860079