“I Don’t Justify Anything Regarding My Son:”: Danish Foreign Fighters’ Initial Attraction and Reaffirmed Commitment to Islamic State and Al Qaeda - Testimonies from Five Relatives
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
“I Don’t Justify Anything Regarding My Son:” : Danish Foreign Fighters’ Initial Attraction and Reaffirmed Commitment to Islamic State and Al Qaeda - Testimonies from Five Relatives. / Jørgensen, Kathrine Elmose.
In: Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2023, p. 1422-1439.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - “I Don’t Justify Anything Regarding My Son:”
T2 - Danish Foreign Fighters’ Initial Attraction and Reaffirmed Commitment to Islamic State and Al Qaeda - Testimonies from Five Relatives
AU - Jørgensen, Kathrine Elmose
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Relatives are a potentially rich source of insight regarding foreign fighters’ pathways into Islamist fundamentalism. However, a small fraction of the literature that explores Salafi-jihadist trajectories examines the testimonies of extremists’ families. Based on qualitative interviews with relatives of five Danish, non-returned male foreign fighters, this article explores how and why—according to their relatives—the men were initially attracted and reaffirmed their commitment to violent jihadism. Findings reveal tensions within the data between ascribing responsibility to the men and mitigating their responsibility. Yet, the article suggests that the relatives’ testimonies should not be perceived simply as using “neutralization techniques” nor as exculpatory narratives, since there is a tendency for the relatives to acknowledge and even accept the men’s deviance.
AB - Relatives are a potentially rich source of insight regarding foreign fighters’ pathways into Islamist fundamentalism. However, a small fraction of the literature that explores Salafi-jihadist trajectories examines the testimonies of extremists’ families. Based on qualitative interviews with relatives of five Danish, non-returned male foreign fighters, this article explores how and why—according to their relatives—the men were initially attracted and reaffirmed their commitment to violent jihadism. Findings reveal tensions within the data between ascribing responsibility to the men and mitigating their responsibility. Yet, the article suggests that the relatives’ testimonies should not be perceived simply as using “neutralization techniques” nor as exculpatory narratives, since there is a tendency for the relatives to acknowledge and even accept the men’s deviance.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - Salafi-jihadist trajectories
KW - relatives
KW - qualitative interviews
KW - non-returned foreign fighters
KW - punctured narratives
U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2022.2045964
DO - 10.1080/09546553.2022.2045964
M3 - Journal article
VL - 35
SP - 1422
EP - 1439
JO - Terrorism and Political Violence
JF - Terrorism and Political Violence
SN - 0954-6553
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 322568265