Subject Matters: Imperialism and the Constitution of International Relations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Subject Matters : Imperialism and the Constitution of International Relations. / Kristensen, Peter Marcus.
In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2023, p. 448–470.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Subject Matters
T2 - Imperialism and the Constitution of International Relations
AU - Kristensen, Peter Marcus
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This article contributes to the critical historical research that has demythologised the ‘noble origins’ of the International Relations discipline (IR) by exposing its imperial, colonial, and racist legacies. Where most critical historiographies have unveiled the centrality of racialised and imperialist ontologies in individual thinkers and theories, this article traces imperialist origins of international thought by reconstructing its impact on administrative-institutional infrastructures. Specifically, it interrogates the most systematic and institutionalised attempt to define the ‘subject matter’ of IR under the International Studies Conference (ISC) organised by the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation (IIIC) of the League of Nations. Through a parallel reading of the archives from ISC's ‘administrative meetings’ and ‘study meetings’, the article contends that the seemingly academic discussions on the subject matter of IR in the ‘administrative meetings’ were in fact intertwined with the imperialist-colonial politics central to ‘study meetings’. The article thus not only challenges IR's conventional history, but its historical ontologies by revealing how race and empire were central to the constitution of its very subject matter and its early institutionalisation.
AB - This article contributes to the critical historical research that has demythologised the ‘noble origins’ of the International Relations discipline (IR) by exposing its imperial, colonial, and racist legacies. Where most critical historiographies have unveiled the centrality of racialised and imperialist ontologies in individual thinkers and theories, this article traces imperialist origins of international thought by reconstructing its impact on administrative-institutional infrastructures. Specifically, it interrogates the most systematic and institutionalised attempt to define the ‘subject matter’ of IR under the International Studies Conference (ISC) organised by the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation (IIIC) of the League of Nations. Through a parallel reading of the archives from ISC's ‘administrative meetings’ and ‘study meetings’, the article contends that the seemingly academic discussions on the subject matter of IR in the ‘administrative meetings’ were in fact intertwined with the imperialist-colonial politics central to ‘study meetings’. The article thus not only challenges IR's conventional history, but its historical ontologies by revealing how race and empire were central to the constitution of its very subject matter and its early institutionalisation.
KW - Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet
KW - Disciplinary History of International Relations
KW - Subject Matter
KW - Imperialism
KW - Racism
KW - Interwar Period
KW - International Studies Conference
U2 - 10.1017/S0260210522000420
DO - 10.1017/S0260210522000420
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 49
SP - 448
EP - 470
JO - Review of International Studies
JF - Review of International Studies
SN - 0260-2105
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 322120511