The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies. / Chen, Alexander L. Q.

In: Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2023, p. 478-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Chen, ALQ 2023, 'The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies', Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 478-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544

APA

Chen, A. L. Q. (2023). The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(3), 478-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544

Vancouver

Chen ALQ. The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies. Territory, Politics, Governance. 2023;11(3):478-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544

Author

Chen, Alexander L. Q. / The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies. In: Territory, Politics, Governance. 2023 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 478-501.

Bibtex

@article{9221786b64bc4a77871fa1e651d1d259,
title = "The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies",
abstract = "This study makes two contributions by, first, developing {\textquoteleft}variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies{\textquoteright} as a conceptual innovation for theorizing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), based, second, on the methodological angles of multi-scalar analysis. Taking the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and the China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor (CICPEC) as a case study, the article argues that the latter is the path-dependent outcome of the former as a result of the spatial layering of competing and complementary state spatial strategies, emerging from the inter-scalar dynamics between (1) the Asian Development Bank (ADB), (2) the Chinese central government, and (3) Yunnan and Guangxi qua provincial governments. The case study identifies two distinct periods of inter-scalar dynamics between 1992 and 2016, highlighting the shifting dynamics of horizontal and vertical scalar tensions emerging in response to different scale- and place-specific horizons of opportunities and challenges confronting differentially situated scalar actors. The conceptual innovation lays the groundwork for deepening our understanding of the BRI – and the context of the Chinese political economy from which it has emerged – through the analytical lens of multi-scalar analysis, opening up for the future possibility of examining the other constituent corridors.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, scale, territory, regional development, state, space, regional governance, political economy",
author = "Chen, {Alexander L. Q.}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "478--501",
journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance",
issn = "2162-2671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Belt and Road Initiative as a variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies

AU - Chen, Alexander L. Q.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This study makes two contributions by, first, developing ‘variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies’ as a conceptual innovation for theorizing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), based, second, on the methodological angles of multi-scalar analysis. Taking the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and the China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor (CICPEC) as a case study, the article argues that the latter is the path-dependent outcome of the former as a result of the spatial layering of competing and complementary state spatial strategies, emerging from the inter-scalar dynamics between (1) the Asian Development Bank (ADB), (2) the Chinese central government, and (3) Yunnan and Guangxi qua provincial governments. The case study identifies two distinct periods of inter-scalar dynamics between 1992 and 2016, highlighting the shifting dynamics of horizontal and vertical scalar tensions emerging in response to different scale- and place-specific horizons of opportunities and challenges confronting differentially situated scalar actors. The conceptual innovation lays the groundwork for deepening our understanding of the BRI – and the context of the Chinese political economy from which it has emerged – through the analytical lens of multi-scalar analysis, opening up for the future possibility of examining the other constituent corridors.

AB - This study makes two contributions by, first, developing ‘variegated agglomeration of multi-scalar state spatial strategies’ as a conceptual innovation for theorizing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), based, second, on the methodological angles of multi-scalar analysis. Taking the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and the China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor (CICPEC) as a case study, the article argues that the latter is the path-dependent outcome of the former as a result of the spatial layering of competing and complementary state spatial strategies, emerging from the inter-scalar dynamics between (1) the Asian Development Bank (ADB), (2) the Chinese central government, and (3) Yunnan and Guangxi qua provincial governments. The case study identifies two distinct periods of inter-scalar dynamics between 1992 and 2016, highlighting the shifting dynamics of horizontal and vertical scalar tensions emerging in response to different scale- and place-specific horizons of opportunities and challenges confronting differentially situated scalar actors. The conceptual innovation lays the groundwork for deepening our understanding of the BRI – and the context of the Chinese political economy from which it has emerged – through the analytical lens of multi-scalar analysis, opening up for the future possibility of examining the other constituent corridors.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - scale

KW - territory

KW - regional development

KW - state

KW - space

KW - regional governance

KW - political economy

U2 - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544

DO - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1870544

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 478

EP - 501

JO - Territory, Politics, Governance

JF - Territory, Politics, Governance

SN - 2162-2671

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 255459122