Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19 : Topic Modeling Study. / Janmohamed, Kamila; Soale, Abdul Nasah; Forastiere, Laura; Tang, Weiming; Sha, Yongjie; Demant, Jakob; Airoldi, Edoardo; Kumar, Navin.

I: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Bind 22, Nr. 10, e21743, 10.2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Janmohamed, K, Soale, AN, Forastiere, L, Tang, W, Sha, Y, Demant, J, Airoldi, E & Kumar, N 2020, 'Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study', Journal of Medical Internet Research, bind 22, nr. 10, e21743. https://doi.org/10.2196/21743

APA

Janmohamed, K., Soale, A. N., Forastiere, L., Tang, W., Sha, Y., Demant, J., Airoldi, E., & Kumar, N. (2020). Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), [e21743]. https://doi.org/10.2196/21743

Vancouver

Janmohamed K, Soale AN, Forastiere L, Tang W, Sha Y, Demant J o.a. Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020 okt.;22(10). e21743. https://doi.org/10.2196/21743

Author

Janmohamed, Kamila ; Soale, Abdul Nasah ; Forastiere, Laura ; Tang, Weiming ; Sha, Yongjie ; Demant, Jakob ; Airoldi, Edoardo ; Kumar, Navin. / Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19 : Topic Modeling Study. I: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020 ; Bind 22, Nr. 10.

Bibtex

@article{2143444c20d242f2a793df83fc43c524,
title = "Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study",
abstract = "Background: The COVID-19 outbreak was designated a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. The relationship between vaping and contracting COVID-19 is unclear, and information on the internet is conflicting. There is some scientific evidence that vaping cannabidiol (CBD), an active ingredient in cannabis that is obtained from the hemp plant, or other substances is associated with more severe manifestations of COVID-19. However, there is also inaccurate information that vaping can aid COVID-19 treatment, as well as expert opinion that CBD, possibly administered through vaping, can mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. Thus, it is necessary to study the spread of inaccurate information to better understand how to promote scientific knowledge and curb inaccurate information, which is critical to the health of vapers. Inaccurate information about vaping and COVID-19 may affect COVID-19 treatment outcomes. Objective: Using structural topic modeling, we aimed to map temporal trends in the web-based vaping narrative (a large data set comprising web-based vaping chatter from several sources) to indicate how the narrative changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We obtained data using a textual query that scanned a data pool of approximately 200,000 different domains (4,027,172 documents and 361,100,284 words) such as public internet forums, blogs, and social media, from August 1, 2019, to April 21, 2020. We then used structural topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence and semantic structures within topics around vaping before and after December 31, 2019, when COVID-19 was reported to the World Health Organization. Results: Broadly, the web-based vaping narrative can be organized into the following groups or archetypes: harms from vaping; Vaping Regulation; Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment; and Vaping Lifestyle. Three archetypes were observed prior to the emergence of COVID-19; however, four archetypes were identified post–COVID-19 (Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment was the additional archetype). A topic related to CBD product preference emerged after COVID-19 was first reported, which may be related to the use of CBD by vapers as a COVID-19 treatment. Conclusions: Our main finding is the emergence of a vape-administered CBD treatment narrative around COVID-19 when comparing the web-based vaping narratives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are key to understanding how vapers respond to inaccurate information about COVID-19, optimizing treatment of vapers who contract COVID-19, and possibly minimizing instances of inaccurate information. The findings have implications for the management of COVID-19 among vapers and the monitoring of web-based content pertinent to tobacco to develop targeted interventions to manage COVID-19 among vapers.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Internet, Modeling, Narrative, Social media, Topic modeling, Trend, Vaping, Web-based health information, Web-based narrative",
author = "Kamila Janmohamed and Soale, {Abdul Nasah} and Laura Forastiere and Weiming Tang and Yongjie Sha and Jakob Demant and Edoardo Airoldi and Navin Kumar",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}Kamila Janmohamed, Abdul-Nasah Soale, Laura Forastiere, Weiming Tang, Yongjie Sha, Jakob Demant, Edoardo Airoldi, Navin Kumar.",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.2196/21743",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "JMIR Publications",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative with COVID-19

T2 - Topic Modeling Study

AU - Janmohamed, Kamila

AU - Soale, Abdul Nasah

AU - Forastiere, Laura

AU - Tang, Weiming

AU - Sha, Yongjie

AU - Demant, Jakob

AU - Airoldi, Edoardo

AU - Kumar, Navin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: ©Kamila Janmohamed, Abdul-Nasah Soale, Laura Forastiere, Weiming Tang, Yongjie Sha, Jakob Demant, Edoardo Airoldi, Navin Kumar.

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - Background: The COVID-19 outbreak was designated a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. The relationship between vaping and contracting COVID-19 is unclear, and information on the internet is conflicting. There is some scientific evidence that vaping cannabidiol (CBD), an active ingredient in cannabis that is obtained from the hemp plant, or other substances is associated with more severe manifestations of COVID-19. However, there is also inaccurate information that vaping can aid COVID-19 treatment, as well as expert opinion that CBD, possibly administered through vaping, can mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. Thus, it is necessary to study the spread of inaccurate information to better understand how to promote scientific knowledge and curb inaccurate information, which is critical to the health of vapers. Inaccurate information about vaping and COVID-19 may affect COVID-19 treatment outcomes. Objective: Using structural topic modeling, we aimed to map temporal trends in the web-based vaping narrative (a large data set comprising web-based vaping chatter from several sources) to indicate how the narrative changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We obtained data using a textual query that scanned a data pool of approximately 200,000 different domains (4,027,172 documents and 361,100,284 words) such as public internet forums, blogs, and social media, from August 1, 2019, to April 21, 2020. We then used structural topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence and semantic structures within topics around vaping before and after December 31, 2019, when COVID-19 was reported to the World Health Organization. Results: Broadly, the web-based vaping narrative can be organized into the following groups or archetypes: harms from vaping; Vaping Regulation; Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment; and Vaping Lifestyle. Three archetypes were observed prior to the emergence of COVID-19; however, four archetypes were identified post–COVID-19 (Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment was the additional archetype). A topic related to CBD product preference emerged after COVID-19 was first reported, which may be related to the use of CBD by vapers as a COVID-19 treatment. Conclusions: Our main finding is the emergence of a vape-administered CBD treatment narrative around COVID-19 when comparing the web-based vaping narratives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are key to understanding how vapers respond to inaccurate information about COVID-19, optimizing treatment of vapers who contract COVID-19, and possibly minimizing instances of inaccurate information. The findings have implications for the management of COVID-19 among vapers and the monitoring of web-based content pertinent to tobacco to develop targeted interventions to manage COVID-19 among vapers.

AB - Background: The COVID-19 outbreak was designated a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. The relationship between vaping and contracting COVID-19 is unclear, and information on the internet is conflicting. There is some scientific evidence that vaping cannabidiol (CBD), an active ingredient in cannabis that is obtained from the hemp plant, or other substances is associated with more severe manifestations of COVID-19. However, there is also inaccurate information that vaping can aid COVID-19 treatment, as well as expert opinion that CBD, possibly administered through vaping, can mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. Thus, it is necessary to study the spread of inaccurate information to better understand how to promote scientific knowledge and curb inaccurate information, which is critical to the health of vapers. Inaccurate information about vaping and COVID-19 may affect COVID-19 treatment outcomes. Objective: Using structural topic modeling, we aimed to map temporal trends in the web-based vaping narrative (a large data set comprising web-based vaping chatter from several sources) to indicate how the narrative changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We obtained data using a textual query that scanned a data pool of approximately 200,000 different domains (4,027,172 documents and 361,100,284 words) such as public internet forums, blogs, and social media, from August 1, 2019, to April 21, 2020. We then used structural topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence and semantic structures within topics around vaping before and after December 31, 2019, when COVID-19 was reported to the World Health Organization. Results: Broadly, the web-based vaping narrative can be organized into the following groups or archetypes: harms from vaping; Vaping Regulation; Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment; and Vaping Lifestyle. Three archetypes were observed prior to the emergence of COVID-19; however, four archetypes were identified post–COVID-19 (Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment was the additional archetype). A topic related to CBD product preference emerged after COVID-19 was first reported, which may be related to the use of CBD by vapers as a COVID-19 treatment. Conclusions: Our main finding is the emergence of a vape-administered CBD treatment narrative around COVID-19 when comparing the web-based vaping narratives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are key to understanding how vapers respond to inaccurate information about COVID-19, optimizing treatment of vapers who contract COVID-19, and possibly minimizing instances of inaccurate information. The findings have implications for the management of COVID-19 among vapers and the monitoring of web-based content pertinent to tobacco to develop targeted interventions to manage COVID-19 among vapers.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Internet

KW - Modeling

KW - Narrative

KW - Social media

KW - Topic modeling

KW - Trend

KW - Vaping

KW - Web-based health information

KW - Web-based narrative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094983591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/21743

DO - 10.2196/21743

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33001829

AN - SCOPUS:85094983591

VL - 22

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 10

M1 - e21743

ER -

ID: 269760700