Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia: Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia : Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities. / Nielsen, Mathias Wullum.

I: NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, Bind 22, Nr. 3, 07.2014, s. 187-203.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, MW 2014, 'Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia: Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities', NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, bind 22, nr. 3, s. 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.905490

APA

Nielsen, M. W. (2014). Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia: Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.905490

Vancouver

Nielsen MW. Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia: Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research. 2014 jul.;22(3):187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.905490

Author

Nielsen, Mathias Wullum. / Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia : Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities. I: NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research. 2014 ; Bind 22, Nr. 3. s. 187-203.

Bibtex

@article{66e8ecb70a6f4226961b42187cfc5208,
title = "Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia: Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities",
abstract = "Gender equality in academia is often perceived as receiving more emphasis in Norway and Sweden than in Denmark. But how do the public research institutions in the three countries approach issues of gender equality differently? This study investigates how activities related to gender equality are articulated and justified in the policy statements of six Scandinavian universities. The analysis reveals some interesting disparities between the countries. In short, the Danish universities seem to be reluctant to deal with gender equality on the basis of rights-based assumptions. While the Norwegian and Swedish universities juxtapose arguments of utility, innovation, justice, and anti-discrimination, the Danish universities primarily refer to aspects of competitiveness, utility, and innovation when justifying activities on gender equality. The article suggests that the lack of justice-oriented perspectives in the Danish statements is an illustrative example of how neo-liberal managerial ideas about work-place productivity and creativity entail new and more instrumental approaches to gender equality issues in academia.",
author = "Nielsen, {Mathias Wullum}",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1080/08038740.2014.905490",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "187--203",
journal = "NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research",
issn = "0803-8740",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justifications of Gender Equality in Academia

T2 - Comparing Gender Equality Policies of Six Scandinavian Universities

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Gender equality in academia is often perceived as receiving more emphasis in Norway and Sweden than in Denmark. But how do the public research institutions in the three countries approach issues of gender equality differently? This study investigates how activities related to gender equality are articulated and justified in the policy statements of six Scandinavian universities. The analysis reveals some interesting disparities between the countries. In short, the Danish universities seem to be reluctant to deal with gender equality on the basis of rights-based assumptions. While the Norwegian and Swedish universities juxtapose arguments of utility, innovation, justice, and anti-discrimination, the Danish universities primarily refer to aspects of competitiveness, utility, and innovation when justifying activities on gender equality. The article suggests that the lack of justice-oriented perspectives in the Danish statements is an illustrative example of how neo-liberal managerial ideas about work-place productivity and creativity entail new and more instrumental approaches to gender equality issues in academia.

AB - Gender equality in academia is often perceived as receiving more emphasis in Norway and Sweden than in Denmark. But how do the public research institutions in the three countries approach issues of gender equality differently? This study investigates how activities related to gender equality are articulated and justified in the policy statements of six Scandinavian universities. The analysis reveals some interesting disparities between the countries. In short, the Danish universities seem to be reluctant to deal with gender equality on the basis of rights-based assumptions. While the Norwegian and Swedish universities juxtapose arguments of utility, innovation, justice, and anti-discrimination, the Danish universities primarily refer to aspects of competitiveness, utility, and innovation when justifying activities on gender equality. The article suggests that the lack of justice-oriented perspectives in the Danish statements is an illustrative example of how neo-liberal managerial ideas about work-place productivity and creativity entail new and more instrumental approaches to gender equality issues in academia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905179640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08038740.2014.905490

DO - 10.1080/08038740.2014.905490

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84905179640

VL - 22

SP - 187

EP - 203

JO - NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research

JF - NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research

SN - 0803-8740

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 235586355