Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Social distancing compliance : A video observational analysis. / Hoeben, Eveline ; Bernasco, Wim; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä; van Baak, Carlijn ; Lindegaard, Marie Rosenkrantz.

I: P L o S One, Bind 16, Nr. 3, e0248221, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hoeben, E, Bernasco, W, Liebst, LS, van Baak, C & Lindegaard, MR 2021, 'Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis', P L o S One, bind 16, nr. 3, e0248221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0248221

APA

Hoeben, E., Bernasco, W., Liebst, L. S., van Baak, C., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2021). Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis. P L o S One, 16(3), [e0248221]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0248221

Vancouver

Hoeben E, Bernasco W, Liebst LS, van Baak C, Lindegaard MR. Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis. P L o S One. 2021;16(3). e0248221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0248221

Author

Hoeben, Eveline ; Bernasco, Wim ; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä ; van Baak, Carlijn ; Lindegaard, Marie Rosenkrantz. / Social distancing compliance : A video observational analysis. I: P L o S One. 2021 ; Bind 16, Nr. 3.

Bibtex

@article{8d5287a01f74416bacef20e6f010abcc,
title = "Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis",
abstract = "PurposeVirus epidemics may be mitigated if people comply with directives to stay at home and keep their distance from strangers in public. As such, there is a public health interest in social distancing compliance. The available evidence on distancing practices in public space is limited, however, by the lack of observational data. Here, we apply video observation as a method to examine to what extent members of the public comply with social distancing directives.DataClosed Circuit Television (CCTV) footage of interactions in public was collected in inner-city Amsterdam, the Netherlands. From the footage, we observed instances of people violating the 1.5-meter distance directives in the weeks before, during, and after these directives were introduced to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsWe find that people complied with the 1.5-meter distance directives when these directives were first introduced, but that the level of compliance started to decline soon after. We also find that violation of the 1.5-meter distance directives is strongly associated with the number of people observed on the street and with non-compliance to stay-at-home directives, operationalized with large-scale aggregated location data from cell phones. All three measures correlate to a varying extent with temporal patterns in the transmission of the COVID-19 virus, temperature, COVID-19 related Google search queries, and media attention to the topic.ConclusionCompliance with 1.5 meter distance directives is short-lived and coincides with the number of people on the street and with compliance to stay-at-home directives. Potential implications of these findings are that keep- distance directives may work best in combination with stay-at-home directives and place-specific crowd-control strategies, and that the number of people on the street and community-wide mobility as captured with cell phone data offer easily measurable proxies for the extent to which people keep sufficient physical distance from others at specific times and locations.",
author = "Eveline Hoeben and Wim Bernasco and Liebst, {Lasse Suonper{\"a}} and {van Baak}, Carlijn and Lindegaard, {Marie Rosenkrantz}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1371/journal. pone.0248221",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social distancing compliance

T2 - A video observational analysis

AU - Hoeben, Eveline

AU - Bernasco, Wim

AU - Liebst, Lasse Suonperä

AU - van Baak, Carlijn

AU - Lindegaard, Marie Rosenkrantz

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - PurposeVirus epidemics may be mitigated if people comply with directives to stay at home and keep their distance from strangers in public. As such, there is a public health interest in social distancing compliance. The available evidence on distancing practices in public space is limited, however, by the lack of observational data. Here, we apply video observation as a method to examine to what extent members of the public comply with social distancing directives.DataClosed Circuit Television (CCTV) footage of interactions in public was collected in inner-city Amsterdam, the Netherlands. From the footage, we observed instances of people violating the 1.5-meter distance directives in the weeks before, during, and after these directives were introduced to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsWe find that people complied with the 1.5-meter distance directives when these directives were first introduced, but that the level of compliance started to decline soon after. We also find that violation of the 1.5-meter distance directives is strongly associated with the number of people observed on the street and with non-compliance to stay-at-home directives, operationalized with large-scale aggregated location data from cell phones. All three measures correlate to a varying extent with temporal patterns in the transmission of the COVID-19 virus, temperature, COVID-19 related Google search queries, and media attention to the topic.ConclusionCompliance with 1.5 meter distance directives is short-lived and coincides with the number of people on the street and with compliance to stay-at-home directives. Potential implications of these findings are that keep- distance directives may work best in combination with stay-at-home directives and place-specific crowd-control strategies, and that the number of people on the street and community-wide mobility as captured with cell phone data offer easily measurable proxies for the extent to which people keep sufficient physical distance from others at specific times and locations.

AB - PurposeVirus epidemics may be mitigated if people comply with directives to stay at home and keep their distance from strangers in public. As such, there is a public health interest in social distancing compliance. The available evidence on distancing practices in public space is limited, however, by the lack of observational data. Here, we apply video observation as a method to examine to what extent members of the public comply with social distancing directives.DataClosed Circuit Television (CCTV) footage of interactions in public was collected in inner-city Amsterdam, the Netherlands. From the footage, we observed instances of people violating the 1.5-meter distance directives in the weeks before, during, and after these directives were introduced to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsWe find that people complied with the 1.5-meter distance directives when these directives were first introduced, but that the level of compliance started to decline soon after. We also find that violation of the 1.5-meter distance directives is strongly associated with the number of people observed on the street and with non-compliance to stay-at-home directives, operationalized with large-scale aggregated location data from cell phones. All three measures correlate to a varying extent with temporal patterns in the transmission of the COVID-19 virus, temperature, COVID-19 related Google search queries, and media attention to the topic.ConclusionCompliance with 1.5 meter distance directives is short-lived and coincides with the number of people on the street and with compliance to stay-at-home directives. Potential implications of these findings are that keep- distance directives may work best in combination with stay-at-home directives and place-specific crowd-control strategies, and that the number of people on the street and community-wide mobility as captured with cell phone data offer easily measurable proxies for the extent to which people keep sufficient physical distance from others at specific times and locations.

U2 - 10.1371/journal. pone.0248221

DO - 10.1371/journal. pone.0248221

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0248221

ER -

ID: 257246782