Standard
A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research : Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies. / Hunt, Lilian; Nielsen, Mathias Wullum; Schiebinger, Londa.
I:
Science, Bind 377, Nr. 6614, 2022, s. 1492-1495.
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
Hunt, L
, Nielsen, MW & Schiebinger, L 2022, '
A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies',
Science, bind 377, nr. 6614, s. 1492-1495.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9775
APA
Hunt, L.
, Nielsen, M. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2022).
A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies.
Science,
377(6614), 1492-1495.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9775
Vancouver
Hunt L
, Nielsen MW, Schiebinger L.
A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies.
Science. 2022;377(6614):1492-1495.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9775
Author
Hunt, Lilian ; Nielsen, Mathias Wullum ; Schiebinger, Londa. / A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research : Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies. I: Science. 2022 ; Bind 377, Nr. 6614. s. 1492-1495.
Bibtex
@article{2f6143d064514345b8864c69467422cb,
title = "A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies",
author = "Lilian Hunt and Nielsen, {Mathias Wullum} and Londa Schiebinger",
note = "Funding Information: There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1126/science.abp9775",
language = "English",
volume = "377",
pages = "1492--1495",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6614",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research
T2 - Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies
AU - Hunt, Lilian
AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum
AU - Schiebinger, Londa
N1 - Funding Information:
There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
U2 - 10.1126/science.abp9775
DO - 10.1126/science.abp9775
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36173857
AN - SCOPUS:85138879091
VL - 377
SP - 1492
EP - 1495
JO - Science
JF - Science
SN - 0036-8075
IS - 6614
ER -