Analysing the significance of silence in qualitative interviewing: questioning and shifting power relations
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Analysing the significance of silence in qualitative interviewing: questioning and shifting power relations. / Bengtsson, Tea Torbenfeldt; Fynbo, Lars.
I: Qualitative Research, Bind 18, Nr. 1, 02.2018, s. 19-35.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysing the significance of silence in qualitative interviewing: questioning and shifting power relations
AU - Bengtsson, Tea Torbenfeldt
AU - Fynbo, Lars
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - In this article we analyse the significance of silence in qualitative interviews with 36 individuals interviewed about high-risk, illegal activities. We describe how silence expresses a dynamic power relationship between interviewer and interviewee. In the analysis, we focus on two different types of silence: ‘silence of the interviewee’ and ‘silence of the interviewer’. We analyse how silence functions as an interviewee’s resistance against being categorized as ‘social deviant’, how an interviewer may use silence strategically, and how silence stemming from an interviewer’s perplexity constructs significant data. We conclude that silence constitutes possibilities for interviewees and interviewers to handle the complex power at play in qualitative interviewing either by maintaining or by losing control of the situation.
AB - In this article we analyse the significance of silence in qualitative interviews with 36 individuals interviewed about high-risk, illegal activities. We describe how silence expresses a dynamic power relationship between interviewer and interviewee. In the analysis, we focus on two different types of silence: ‘silence of the interviewee’ and ‘silence of the interviewer’. We analyse how silence functions as an interviewee’s resistance against being categorized as ‘social deviant’, how an interviewer may use silence strategically, and how silence stemming from an interviewer’s perplexity constructs significant data. We conclude that silence constitutes possibilities for interviewees and interviewers to handle the complex power at play in qualitative interviewing either by maintaining or by losing control of the situation.
KW - power
KW - qualitative interviewing
KW - risk behaviour
KW - silence
KW - social deviance
U2 - 10.1177/1468794117694220
DO - 10.1177/1468794117694220
M3 - Journal article
VL - 18
SP - 19
EP - 35
JO - Qualitative Research
JF - Qualitative Research
SN - 1468-7941
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 209829122