Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe: In search of control

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe : In search of control . / Ibsen, Christian Lyhne.

I: European Journal of Industrial Relations, Bind 27, Nr. 1, 2021, s. 23-39.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ibsen, CL 2021, 'Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe: In search of control ', European Journal of Industrial Relations, bind 27, nr. 1, s. 23-39. https://doi.org/0.1177/0959680119853997

APA

Ibsen, C. L. (2021). Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe: In search of control . European Journal of Industrial Relations, 27(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/0.1177/0959680119853997

Vancouver

Ibsen CL. Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe: In search of control . European Journal of Industrial Relations. 2021;27(1):23-39. https://doi.org/0.1177/0959680119853997

Author

Ibsen, Christian Lyhne. / Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe : In search of control . I: European Journal of Industrial Relations. 2021 ; Bind 27, Nr. 1. s. 23-39.

Bibtex

@article{062c4db6802e472a96689a9e908cc314,
title = "Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe: In search of control ",
abstract = "Dispute resolution by third parties is a cornerstone of national industrial relations systems across Europe. However, the formal powers of the institutions of conciliation, mediation and arbitration vary considerably across countries. I aim to explain the existence of strong third-party intervention across 17 Western European countries, using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. I test two hypotheses: first, that strong institutions are established to control collective bargaining when unions are powerful but fragmented; second, that strong institutions reflect legal traditions that use civil courts rather than specialized labour courts. The analysis supports the first hypothesis but not the second. Recent reforms since the Great Recession in Southern European countries further corroborate this finding.",
author = "Ibsen, {Christian Lyhne}",
year = "2021",
doi = "0.1177/0959680119853997",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "23--39",
journal = "European Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0959-6801",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conciliation, mediation and arbitration in collective bargaining in Western Europe

T2 - In search of control

AU - Ibsen, Christian Lyhne

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Dispute resolution by third parties is a cornerstone of national industrial relations systems across Europe. However, the formal powers of the institutions of conciliation, mediation and arbitration vary considerably across countries. I aim to explain the existence of strong third-party intervention across 17 Western European countries, using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. I test two hypotheses: first, that strong institutions are established to control collective bargaining when unions are powerful but fragmented; second, that strong institutions reflect legal traditions that use civil courts rather than specialized labour courts. The analysis supports the first hypothesis but not the second. Recent reforms since the Great Recession in Southern European countries further corroborate this finding.

AB - Dispute resolution by third parties is a cornerstone of national industrial relations systems across Europe. However, the formal powers of the institutions of conciliation, mediation and arbitration vary considerably across countries. I aim to explain the existence of strong third-party intervention across 17 Western European countries, using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. I test two hypotheses: first, that strong institutions are established to control collective bargaining when unions are powerful but fragmented; second, that strong institutions reflect legal traditions that use civil courts rather than specialized labour courts. The analysis supports the first hypothesis but not the second. Recent reforms since the Great Recession in Southern European countries further corroborate this finding.

U2 - 0.1177/0959680119853997

DO - 0.1177/0959680119853997

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 23

EP - 39

JO - European Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - European Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0959-6801

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 255747767