Difference, Power and, Redistribution: Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Standard

Difference, Power and, Redistribution : Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State. / Frederiksen, Morten.

2009. Paper præsenteret ved Beyond Bourdieu - Habitus, Capital and Social Stratification', Kbh., Danmark.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Harvard

Frederiksen, M 2009, 'Difference, Power and, Redistribution: Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State', Paper fremlagt ved Beyond Bourdieu - Habitus, Capital and Social Stratification', Kbh., Danmark, 01/12/2009 - 02/12/2009.

APA

Frederiksen, M. (2009). Difference, Power and, Redistribution: Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State. Paper præsenteret ved Beyond Bourdieu - Habitus, Capital and Social Stratification', Kbh., Danmark.

Vancouver

Frederiksen M. Difference, Power and, Redistribution: Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State. 2009. Paper præsenteret ved Beyond Bourdieu - Habitus, Capital and Social Stratification', Kbh., Danmark.

Author

Frederiksen, Morten. / Difference, Power and, Redistribution : Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State. Paper præsenteret ved Beyond Bourdieu - Habitus, Capital and Social Stratification', Kbh., Danmark.19 s.

Bibtex

@conference{33a675701f8611df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "Difference, Power and, Redistribution: Realigning Bourdieu and the Welfare State",
abstract = "  AbstractThis paper addresses the issue of transposing Bourdieu to France to other nations. It is claimed that such transpositions often are characterised by the adaptation of object to methodology rather than the other way around. Departing from the Danish experience, the paper takes the universal welfare state as a structure of social space very different from the setting of France. It is argued that engaging such a case may show new path of analysis fruitful to the Bourdieusian perspective. Three central themes in sociology of welfare states are identified. Welfare states are both perceived as structures of domination and expressions of emancipating modernisation. Welfare states are perceived as both structures of democratic redistribution and as power based resource appropriation. Finally welfare states are perceived as normative structures and institutions. Pierre Bourdieu's theory of material and symbolic stratification informs a reassessment of these themes in an attempt at integration of meaning and structure in the concept of social citizenship. It is claimed the Bourdieusian perspective must be reworked in order to engage the interplay between particular interests in reproduction of capital and the establishment of universality as normative standard of evaluation in the field of power as well as in social space as such. ",
author = "Morten Frederiksen",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 01-12-2009 Through 02-12-2009",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Difference, Power and, Redistribution

AU - Frederiksen, Morten

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 -   AbstractThis paper addresses the issue of transposing Bourdieu to France to other nations. It is claimed that such transpositions often are characterised by the adaptation of object to methodology rather than the other way around. Departing from the Danish experience, the paper takes the universal welfare state as a structure of social space very different from the setting of France. It is argued that engaging such a case may show new path of analysis fruitful to the Bourdieusian perspective. Three central themes in sociology of welfare states are identified. Welfare states are both perceived as structures of domination and expressions of emancipating modernisation. Welfare states are perceived as both structures of democratic redistribution and as power based resource appropriation. Finally welfare states are perceived as normative structures and institutions. Pierre Bourdieu's theory of material and symbolic stratification informs a reassessment of these themes in an attempt at integration of meaning and structure in the concept of social citizenship. It is claimed the Bourdieusian perspective must be reworked in order to engage the interplay between particular interests in reproduction of capital and the establishment of universality as normative standard of evaluation in the field of power as well as in social space as such.

AB -   AbstractThis paper addresses the issue of transposing Bourdieu to France to other nations. It is claimed that such transpositions often are characterised by the adaptation of object to methodology rather than the other way around. Departing from the Danish experience, the paper takes the universal welfare state as a structure of social space very different from the setting of France. It is argued that engaging such a case may show new path of analysis fruitful to the Bourdieusian perspective. Three central themes in sociology of welfare states are identified. Welfare states are both perceived as structures of domination and expressions of emancipating modernisation. Welfare states are perceived as both structures of democratic redistribution and as power based resource appropriation. Finally welfare states are perceived as normative structures and institutions. Pierre Bourdieu's theory of material and symbolic stratification informs a reassessment of these themes in an attempt at integration of meaning and structure in the concept of social citizenship. It is claimed the Bourdieusian perspective must be reworked in order to engage the interplay between particular interests in reproduction of capital and the establishment of universality as normative standard of evaluation in the field of power as well as in social space as such.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 1 December 2009 through 2 December 2009

ER -

ID: 18150920