Do Google Scholar and Web of Science reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently? A comparison of U.S. Researchers in sociology and economics
Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Do Google Scholar and Web of Science reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently? A comparison of U.S. Researchers in sociology and economics. / Andersen, Jens Peter; Nielsen, Mathias Wullum.
2017. 1156-1161 Paper præsenteret ved 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2017, Wuhan, Kina.Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - Do Google Scholar and Web of Science reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently? A comparison of U.S. Researchers in sociology and economics
AU - Andersen, Jens Peter
AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Several studies have demonstrated differences in Google Scholars' and Web of Science's coverage of citing publications. In this paper, we examine whether citation data retrieved from Web of Science and Google Scholar reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently. Our study is based on a sample of 200 randomly selected U.S. authors in economics- and sociology-related research areas. Our results illustrate noteworthy gender disparities in the per-paper citation rates across the two databases. In sociology, we find that women benefit more than men, when impact assessments are based on data from Google Scholar, while the opposite is the case in economics. If our results prove to be robust in a larger data-set, based on a more exhaustive matching of documents, they illustrate how the selection of data-sources can have consequences for how individual scholars are assessed, e.g. in tenure or grant review evaluations.
AB - Several studies have demonstrated differences in Google Scholars' and Web of Science's coverage of citing publications. In this paper, we examine whether citation data retrieved from Web of Science and Google Scholar reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently. Our study is based on a sample of 200 randomly selected U.S. authors in economics- and sociology-related research areas. Our results illustrate noteworthy gender disparities in the per-paper citation rates across the two databases. In sociology, we find that women benefit more than men, when impact assessments are based on data from Google Scholar, while the opposite is the case in economics. If our results prove to be robust in a larger data-set, based on a more exhaustive matching of documents, they illustrate how the selection of data-sources can have consequences for how individual scholars are assessed, e.g. in tenure or grant review evaluations.
KW - Data accuracy and disambiguation
KW - Journals, databases and electronic publications
KW - Science policy and research assessment
KW - The application of informetrics on evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036608324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:85036608324
SP - 1156
EP - 1161
T2 - 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2017
Y2 - 16 October 2017 through 20 October 2017
ER -
ID: 238753871