Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law : the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era. / Refslund, Bjarke; Jaehrling, Karen ; Johnson, Mathew; Koukiadaki , Aristea ; Larsen, Trine Pernille; Stiehm, Christin .

I: Journal of Common Market Studies, Bind 58, Nr. 5, 29.01.2020, s. 1165-1181.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Refslund, B, Jaehrling, K, Johnson, M, Koukiadaki , A, Larsen, TP & Stiehm, C 2020, 'Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era', Journal of Common Market Studies, bind 58, nr. 5, s. 1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13023

APA

Refslund, B., Jaehrling, K., Johnson, M., Koukiadaki , A., Larsen, T. P., & Stiehm, C. (2020). Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(5), 1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13023

Vancouver

Refslund B, Jaehrling K, Johnson M, Koukiadaki A, Larsen TP, Stiehm C. Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2020 jan. 29;58(5):1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13023

Author

Refslund, Bjarke ; Jaehrling, Karen ; Johnson, Mathew ; Koukiadaki , Aristea ; Larsen, Trine Pernille ; Stiehm, Christin . / Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law : the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era. I: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2020 ; Bind 58, Nr. 5. s. 1165-1181.

Bibtex

@article{4648a6e4d66a4e1a81d37f4478da83f1,
title = "Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-R{\"u}ffert Era",
abstract = "Judicial Europeanization, particularly European case law and the R{\"u}ffert ruling, has created significant legal uncertainty in the use of labour clauses in public procurement, which may constrain national policymakers. However, national actors find ways to {\textquoteleft}push back{\textquoteright} against Europeanization in order to prioritize domestic policy goals. By analysing the long‐term political dynamic surrounding public procurement in Denmark, Germany and the UK since the implementation of the revised 2014 public procurement directive, we show how both national actors, and actors at subnational level, where much public procurement actually takes place, contest the Europeanization of public policies. Variation in the willingness and ability of actors to leverage the legal uncertainty to adopt labour clauses results in diverging policy trajectories, but also creates a room for policy innovation. This alters the ultimate outcome of the European regulatory agenda and results in a continued divergence of public policies across member states.",
author = "Bjarke Refslund and Karen Jaehrling and Mathew Johnson and Aristea Koukiadaki and Larsen, {Trine Pernille} and Christin Stiehm",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1111/jcms.13023",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "58",
pages = "1165--1181",
journal = "Journal of Common Market Studies",
issn = "0021-9886",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law

T2 - the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era

AU - Refslund, Bjarke

AU - Jaehrling, Karen

AU - Johnson, Mathew

AU - Koukiadaki , Aristea

AU - Larsen, Trine Pernille

AU - Stiehm, Christin

PY - 2020/1/29

Y1 - 2020/1/29

N2 - Judicial Europeanization, particularly European case law and the Rüffert ruling, has created significant legal uncertainty in the use of labour clauses in public procurement, which may constrain national policymakers. However, national actors find ways to ‘push back’ against Europeanization in order to prioritize domestic policy goals. By analysing the long‐term political dynamic surrounding public procurement in Denmark, Germany and the UK since the implementation of the revised 2014 public procurement directive, we show how both national actors, and actors at subnational level, where much public procurement actually takes place, contest the Europeanization of public policies. Variation in the willingness and ability of actors to leverage the legal uncertainty to adopt labour clauses results in diverging policy trajectories, but also creates a room for policy innovation. This alters the ultimate outcome of the European regulatory agenda and results in a continued divergence of public policies across member states.

AB - Judicial Europeanization, particularly European case law and the Rüffert ruling, has created significant legal uncertainty in the use of labour clauses in public procurement, which may constrain national policymakers. However, national actors find ways to ‘push back’ against Europeanization in order to prioritize domestic policy goals. By analysing the long‐term political dynamic surrounding public procurement in Denmark, Germany and the UK since the implementation of the revised 2014 public procurement directive, we show how both national actors, and actors at subnational level, where much public procurement actually takes place, contest the Europeanization of public policies. Variation in the willingness and ability of actors to leverage the legal uncertainty to adopt labour clauses results in diverging policy trajectories, but also creates a room for policy innovation. This alters the ultimate outcome of the European regulatory agenda and results in a continued divergence of public policies across member states.

U2 - 10.1111/jcms.13023

DO - 10.1111/jcms.13023

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 58

SP - 1165

EP - 1181

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 252827237