On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Formidling

Standard

On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals. / Heinskou, Marie Bruvik; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä.

2015. Paper præsenteret ved American Sociological Association, Chicago, USA.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Formidling

Harvard

Heinskou, MB & Liebst, LS 2015, 'On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals', Paper fremlagt ved American Sociological Association, Chicago, USA, 22/08/2015 - 25/08/2015.

APA

Heinskou, M. B., & Liebst, L. S. (2015). On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals. Paper præsenteret ved American Sociological Association, Chicago, USA.

Vancouver

Heinskou MB, Liebst LS. On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals. 2015. Paper præsenteret ved American Sociological Association, Chicago, USA.

Author

Heinskou, Marie Bruvik ; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä. / On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals. Paper præsenteret ved American Sociological Association, Chicago, USA.

Bibtex

@conference{296f3fdd54bf4924917428ba0cff7757,
title = "On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals",
abstract = " Randall Collins{\textquoteright} interaction ritual (IR) theory suggests solidarity as neurologically hardwired in the capacity for rhythmic entrainment. Yet, this article suggests that IR theory may benefit from being tied more firmly to recent neurological research, specifically Stephen W. Porges{\textquoteright} neurophysiological polyvagal theory. IR theory does not sufficiently acknowledge the autonomic nervous system as a system involving a phylogenetically ordered response hierarchy, of which only one subsystem supports prosocial behavior. The ritual ingredients of shared attention and mood may be clarified as part of a social engagement system, neurally regulating attention and arousal via brain-face-heart circuits. This allows rhythmic entrainment to be specified as a neural epiphenomenon of the social engagement system. The polyvagal perspective, moreover, challenges IR theory to reconsider the importance of biological individual differences. Ritual success may not merely be ascribed to interactional effects, but also to reciprocal causality between situations and neurobiological properties of ritual participants.",
author = "Heinskou, {Marie Bruvik} and Liebst, {Lasse Suonper{\"a}}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 22-08-2015 Through 25-08-2015",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - On the elementary neural forms of interaction rituals

AU - Heinskou, Marie Bruvik

AU - Liebst, Lasse Suonperä

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Randall Collins’ interaction ritual (IR) theory suggests solidarity as neurologically hardwired in the capacity for rhythmic entrainment. Yet, this article suggests that IR theory may benefit from being tied more firmly to recent neurological research, specifically Stephen W. Porges’ neurophysiological polyvagal theory. IR theory does not sufficiently acknowledge the autonomic nervous system as a system involving a phylogenetically ordered response hierarchy, of which only one subsystem supports prosocial behavior. The ritual ingredients of shared attention and mood may be clarified as part of a social engagement system, neurally regulating attention and arousal via brain-face-heart circuits. This allows rhythmic entrainment to be specified as a neural epiphenomenon of the social engagement system. The polyvagal perspective, moreover, challenges IR theory to reconsider the importance of biological individual differences. Ritual success may not merely be ascribed to interactional effects, but also to reciprocal causality between situations and neurobiological properties of ritual participants.

AB - Randall Collins’ interaction ritual (IR) theory suggests solidarity as neurologically hardwired in the capacity for rhythmic entrainment. Yet, this article suggests that IR theory may benefit from being tied more firmly to recent neurological research, specifically Stephen W. Porges’ neurophysiological polyvagal theory. IR theory does not sufficiently acknowledge the autonomic nervous system as a system involving a phylogenetically ordered response hierarchy, of which only one subsystem supports prosocial behavior. The ritual ingredients of shared attention and mood may be clarified as part of a social engagement system, neurally regulating attention and arousal via brain-face-heart circuits. This allows rhythmic entrainment to be specified as a neural epiphenomenon of the social engagement system. The polyvagal perspective, moreover, challenges IR theory to reconsider the importance of biological individual differences. Ritual success may not merely be ascribed to interactional effects, but also to reciprocal causality between situations and neurobiological properties of ritual participants.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 22 August 2015 through 25 August 2015

ER -

ID: 135756133