Paradoxes of social mobility in London

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Paradoxes of social mobility in London. / Breen, Richard; In, Jung.

I: British Journal of Sociology, Bind 74, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 781-798.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Breen, R & In, J 2023, 'Paradoxes of social mobility in London', British Journal of Sociology, bind 74, nr. 5, s. 781-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13022

APA

Breen, R., & In, J. (2023). Paradoxes of social mobility in London. British Journal of Sociology, 74(5), 781-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13022

Vancouver

Breen R, In J. Paradoxes of social mobility in London. British Journal of Sociology. 2023;74(5):781-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13022

Author

Breen, Richard ; In, Jung. / Paradoxes of social mobility in London. I: British Journal of Sociology. 2023 ; Bind 74, Nr. 5. s. 781-798.

Bibtex

@article{ad00947e2d7f420c96190c4f700a2ce6,
title = "Paradoxes of social mobility in London",
abstract = "We analyse social mobility in London and seek to address two paradoxes. Among people living in London, relative mobility, or social fluidity, appears to be remarkably low when compared with other regions of Great Britain. But social fluidity among people who were brought up in London is similar to that of people brought up elsewhere in Britain. This is our first paradox. Furthermore, it is widely held that social fluidity is higher among people with higher levels of education, yet, the proportion of people with a University degree is much higher among people living in London than in any other region: how is this compatible with its relatively low social fluidity? This is our second paradox. We address these puzzles and find that they are largely explained by patterns of migration into and out of London by two groups that have received little attention hitherto in studies of mobility in the capital: International migrants and people who were brought up in London but who no longer live there.",
keywords = "London, migration, social fluidity, social mobility",
author = "Richard Breen and Jung In",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/1468-4446.13022",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "781--798",
journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0007-1315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxes of social mobility in London

AU - Breen, Richard

AU - In, Jung

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - We analyse social mobility in London and seek to address two paradoxes. Among people living in London, relative mobility, or social fluidity, appears to be remarkably low when compared with other regions of Great Britain. But social fluidity among people who were brought up in London is similar to that of people brought up elsewhere in Britain. This is our first paradox. Furthermore, it is widely held that social fluidity is higher among people with higher levels of education, yet, the proportion of people with a University degree is much higher among people living in London than in any other region: how is this compatible with its relatively low social fluidity? This is our second paradox. We address these puzzles and find that they are largely explained by patterns of migration into and out of London by two groups that have received little attention hitherto in studies of mobility in the capital: International migrants and people who were brought up in London but who no longer live there.

AB - We analyse social mobility in London and seek to address two paradoxes. Among people living in London, relative mobility, or social fluidity, appears to be remarkably low when compared with other regions of Great Britain. But social fluidity among people who were brought up in London is similar to that of people brought up elsewhere in Britain. This is our first paradox. Furthermore, it is widely held that social fluidity is higher among people with higher levels of education, yet, the proportion of people with a University degree is much higher among people living in London than in any other region: how is this compatible with its relatively low social fluidity? This is our second paradox. We address these puzzles and find that they are largely explained by patterns of migration into and out of London by two groups that have received little attention hitherto in studies of mobility in the capital: International migrants and people who were brought up in London but who no longer live there.

KW - London

KW - migration

KW - social fluidity

KW - social mobility

U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.13022

DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.13022

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37086444

AN - SCOPUS:85153486652

VL - 74

SP - 781

EP - 798

JO - British Journal of Sociology

JF - British Journal of Sociology

SN - 0007-1315

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 346599207