Paradoxes of social mobility in London
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Paradoxes of social mobility in London. / Breen, Richard; In, Jung.
I: British Journal of Sociology, Bind 74, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 781-798.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Paradoxes of social mobility in London
AU - Breen, Richard
AU - In, Jung
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We analyse social mobility in London and seek to address two paradoxes. Among people living in London, relative mobility, or social fluidity, appears to be remarkably low when compared with other regions of Great Britain. But social fluidity among people who were brought up in London is similar to that of people brought up elsewhere in Britain. This is our first paradox. Furthermore, it is widely held that social fluidity is higher among people with higher levels of education, yet, the proportion of people with a University degree is much higher among people living in London than in any other region: how is this compatible with its relatively low social fluidity? This is our second paradox. We address these puzzles and find that they are largely explained by patterns of migration into and out of London by two groups that have received little attention hitherto in studies of mobility in the capital: International migrants and people who were brought up in London but who no longer live there.
AB - We analyse social mobility in London and seek to address two paradoxes. Among people living in London, relative mobility, or social fluidity, appears to be remarkably low when compared with other regions of Great Britain. But social fluidity among people who were brought up in London is similar to that of people brought up elsewhere in Britain. This is our first paradox. Furthermore, it is widely held that social fluidity is higher among people with higher levels of education, yet, the proportion of people with a University degree is much higher among people living in London than in any other region: how is this compatible with its relatively low social fluidity? This is our second paradox. We address these puzzles and find that they are largely explained by patterns of migration into and out of London by two groups that have received little attention hitherto in studies of mobility in the capital: International migrants and people who were brought up in London but who no longer live there.
KW - London
KW - migration
KW - social fluidity
KW - social mobility
U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.13022
DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.13022
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37086444
AN - SCOPUS:85153486652
VL - 74
SP - 781
EP - 798
JO - British Journal of Sociology
JF - British Journal of Sociology
SN - 0007-1315
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 346599207