The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining. / Ibsen, Christian Lyhne.

I: British Journal of Industrial Relations, Bind 54, Nr. 2, 2016, s. 285–310.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ibsen, CL 2016, 'The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining', British Journal of Industrial Relations, bind 54, nr. 2, s. 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12142

APA

Ibsen, C. L. (2016). The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12142

Vancouver

Ibsen CL. The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2016;54(2):285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12142

Author

Ibsen, Christian Lyhne. / The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining. I: British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2016 ; Bind 54, Nr. 2. s. 285–310.

Bibtex

@article{f94adf7ee62e4becbb1416fd024a6ffb,
title = "The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining",
abstract = "This article compares coordinated collective bargaining in Sweden and Denmarkafter centralized bargaining. Existing theories — power resource and cross-classalliance theory — seem capable of explaining the transition from centralizedbargaining to pattern bargaining system. However, they do not explain theinternal stability of bargaining coordination once established. This analysisstresses the role of mediation institutions of both countries for solving collectiveaction problems in pattern bargaining by pegging other settlements to themanufacturing labour cost norm. Mediation capabilities, however, dier, whichis reflected in more frequent defections in Sweden than in Denmark and thusa more unstable bargaining coordination. These dierences have substantiveconsequences for bargaining outcomes in the two countries.",
author = "Ibsen, {Christian Lyhne}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/bjir.12142",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "285–310",
journal = "British Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0007-1080",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of mediation institutions in Sweden and Denmark after centralized bargaining

AU - Ibsen, Christian Lyhne

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article compares coordinated collective bargaining in Sweden and Denmarkafter centralized bargaining. Existing theories — power resource and cross-classalliance theory — seem capable of explaining the transition from centralizedbargaining to pattern bargaining system. However, they do not explain theinternal stability of bargaining coordination once established. This analysisstresses the role of mediation institutions of both countries for solving collectiveaction problems in pattern bargaining by pegging other settlements to themanufacturing labour cost norm. Mediation capabilities, however, dier, whichis reflected in more frequent defections in Sweden than in Denmark and thusa more unstable bargaining coordination. These dierences have substantiveconsequences for bargaining outcomes in the two countries.

AB - This article compares coordinated collective bargaining in Sweden and Denmarkafter centralized bargaining. Existing theories — power resource and cross-classalliance theory — seem capable of explaining the transition from centralizedbargaining to pattern bargaining system. However, they do not explain theinternal stability of bargaining coordination once established. This analysisstresses the role of mediation institutions of both countries for solving collectiveaction problems in pattern bargaining by pegging other settlements to themanufacturing labour cost norm. Mediation capabilities, however, dier, whichis reflected in more frequent defections in Sweden than in Denmark and thusa more unstable bargaining coordination. These dierences have substantiveconsequences for bargaining outcomes in the two countries.

U2 - 10.1111/bjir.12142

DO - 10.1111/bjir.12142

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 285

EP - 310

JO - British Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - British Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0007-1080

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 143146835