What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ?

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

Standard

What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ? / Colclough, Christina Jayne.

Kbh. : Museum Tusculanum, 2005. 47 s. (FAOS Forskningsnotat; Nr. 65).

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

Harvard

Colclough, CJ 2005, What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ? FAOS Forskningsnotat, nr. 65, Museum Tusculanum, Kbh.

APA

Colclough, C. J. (2005). What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ? Museum Tusculanum. FAOS Forskningsnotat Nr. 65

Vancouver

Colclough CJ. What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ? Kbh.: Museum Tusculanum, 2005. 47 s. (FAOS Forskningsnotat; Nr. 65).

Author

Colclough, Christina Jayne. / What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ?. Kbh. : Museum Tusculanum, 2005. 47 s. (FAOS Forskningsnotat; Nr. 65).

Bibtex

@book{40035fb02b8211df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ?",
abstract = "This research paper presents and critically discusses on a theoretical level two approaches within comparative political economy that aim at explaining the contemporary diversity of capitalists systems and corporate strategies - the regulation approach, and the varieties of capitalism approach. It does so by comparing the role of institutions and how each theory deals with institutional creation, change and the diffusion of practices across space with new advances in neo-institutional theory. The aim of the paper is to find a coherent combination of research approaches that successfully can combine micro-economic and extra-economic practices (in particular labour-management relations) at the level of the firm to macro-economic and political institutional forms at the level of the national political economy. It does so by pointing at the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches and by suggesting ways in which to bring them together. Specific attention is given to how the relation between management and employees is strategically defined and implemented in practice. The overall objective is to create a combined approach that can grasp under what conditions multinational corporations are more likely to incorporate, implement and diffuse extensive labour-management relations alongside economic strategies. The paper proposes that the extent to which this happens will depend on three inter-related processes: a) the internalisation of the institutional context into firm organisation, b) the diffusion, adaptation, and imitation of practices and c) through third party pressures. In conclusion the paper raises a number of research questions that can form the basis of empirical research into the role of labour-management relations across and within political economies.",
author = "Colclough, {Christina Jayne}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "FAOS Forskningsnotat",
publisher = "Museum Tusculanum",
number = "65",

}

RIS

TY - RPRT

T1 - What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ?

AU - Colclough, Christina Jayne

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This research paper presents and critically discusses on a theoretical level two approaches within comparative political economy that aim at explaining the contemporary diversity of capitalists systems and corporate strategies - the regulation approach, and the varieties of capitalism approach. It does so by comparing the role of institutions and how each theory deals with institutional creation, change and the diffusion of practices across space with new advances in neo-institutional theory. The aim of the paper is to find a coherent combination of research approaches that successfully can combine micro-economic and extra-economic practices (in particular labour-management relations) at the level of the firm to macro-economic and political institutional forms at the level of the national political economy. It does so by pointing at the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches and by suggesting ways in which to bring them together. Specific attention is given to how the relation between management and employees is strategically defined and implemented in practice. The overall objective is to create a combined approach that can grasp under what conditions multinational corporations are more likely to incorporate, implement and diffuse extensive labour-management relations alongside economic strategies. The paper proposes that the extent to which this happens will depend on three inter-related processes: a) the internalisation of the institutional context into firm organisation, b) the diffusion, adaptation, and imitation of practices and c) through third party pressures. In conclusion the paper raises a number of research questions that can form the basis of empirical research into the role of labour-management relations across and within political economies.

AB - This research paper presents and critically discusses on a theoretical level two approaches within comparative political economy that aim at explaining the contemporary diversity of capitalists systems and corporate strategies - the regulation approach, and the varieties of capitalism approach. It does so by comparing the role of institutions and how each theory deals with institutional creation, change and the diffusion of practices across space with new advances in neo-institutional theory. The aim of the paper is to find a coherent combination of research approaches that successfully can combine micro-economic and extra-economic practices (in particular labour-management relations) at the level of the firm to macro-economic and political institutional forms at the level of the national political economy. It does so by pointing at the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches and by suggesting ways in which to bring them together. Specific attention is given to how the relation between management and employees is strategically defined and implemented in practice. The overall objective is to create a combined approach that can grasp under what conditions multinational corporations are more likely to incorporate, implement and diffuse extensive labour-management relations alongside economic strategies. The paper proposes that the extent to which this happens will depend on three inter-related processes: a) the internalisation of the institutional context into firm organisation, b) the diffusion, adaptation, and imitation of practices and c) through third party pressures. In conclusion the paper raises a number of research questions that can form the basis of empirical research into the role of labour-management relations across and within political economies.

M3 - Report

T3 - FAOS Forskningsnotat

BT - What Makes Capitalisms andCorporate Strategies Differ?

PB - Museum Tusculanum

CY - Kbh.

ER -

ID: 18478750