Ideas and power in employment relations studies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Ideas and power in employment relations studies. / Carstensen, Martin B.; Ibsen, Christian Lyhne; Schmidt, Vivien A.

I: Industrial Relations, Bind 61, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 3-21.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Carstensen, MB, Ibsen, CL & Schmidt, VA 2022, 'Ideas and power in employment relations studies', Industrial Relations, bind 61, nr. 1, s. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302

APA

Carstensen, M. B., Ibsen, C. L., & Schmidt, V. A. (2022). Ideas and power in employment relations studies. Industrial Relations, 61(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302

Vancouver

Carstensen MB, Ibsen CL, Schmidt VA. Ideas and power in employment relations studies. Industrial Relations. 2022;61(1):3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302

Author

Carstensen, Martin B. ; Ibsen, Christian Lyhne ; Schmidt, Vivien A. / Ideas and power in employment relations studies. I: Industrial Relations. 2022 ; Bind 61, Nr. 1. s. 3-21.

Bibtex

@article{c7f02827a4e3425e9702a5c43c9e6b6e,
title = "Ideas and power in employment relations studies",
abstract = "Motivated by the efforts to understand shifting dynamics of change and stability in employment relations—not least ones brought on by a decade of crisis in what was a neoliberal consensus—scholars increasingly focus on the role of ideas, discourses, and identities. This paper argues for the potential of continuing down this path of employing ideational explanations in employment relations. First, it highlights four key weaknesses of employing more pure materialist–institutionalist approaches that have traditionally dominated employment relations scholarship. Second, it argues that to recognize and build on existing efforts to bring in ideas to employment relations, it is useful to place these on the macro-, meso-, and micro levels. Third, to further advance an ideational perspective on employment relations, it proposes to place more centrally the concept of ideational power. Fourth, it presents key insights from the papers that make up the Special Issue and fleshes out how the individual papers of the Special Issue contribute to this agenda.",
author = "Carstensen, {Martin B.} and Ibsen, {Christian Lyhne} and Schmidt, {Vivien A.}",
note = "https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/irel.12302",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "3--21",
journal = "Industrial Relations",
issn = "0019-8676",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideas and power in employment relations studies

AU - Carstensen, Martin B.

AU - Ibsen, Christian Lyhne

AU - Schmidt, Vivien A.

N1 - https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Motivated by the efforts to understand shifting dynamics of change and stability in employment relations—not least ones brought on by a decade of crisis in what was a neoliberal consensus—scholars increasingly focus on the role of ideas, discourses, and identities. This paper argues for the potential of continuing down this path of employing ideational explanations in employment relations. First, it highlights four key weaknesses of employing more pure materialist–institutionalist approaches that have traditionally dominated employment relations scholarship. Second, it argues that to recognize and build on existing efforts to bring in ideas to employment relations, it is useful to place these on the macro-, meso-, and micro levels. Third, to further advance an ideational perspective on employment relations, it proposes to place more centrally the concept of ideational power. Fourth, it presents key insights from the papers that make up the Special Issue and fleshes out how the individual papers of the Special Issue contribute to this agenda.

AB - Motivated by the efforts to understand shifting dynamics of change and stability in employment relations—not least ones brought on by a decade of crisis in what was a neoliberal consensus—scholars increasingly focus on the role of ideas, discourses, and identities. This paper argues for the potential of continuing down this path of employing ideational explanations in employment relations. First, it highlights four key weaknesses of employing more pure materialist–institutionalist approaches that have traditionally dominated employment relations scholarship. Second, it argues that to recognize and build on existing efforts to bring in ideas to employment relations, it is useful to place these on the macro-, meso-, and micro levels. Third, to further advance an ideational perspective on employment relations, it proposes to place more centrally the concept of ideational power. Fourth, it presents key insights from the papers that make up the Special Issue and fleshes out how the individual papers of the Special Issue contribute to this agenda.

U2 - 10.1111/irel.12302

DO - 10.1111/irel.12302

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 3

EP - 21

JO - Industrial Relations

JF - Industrial Relations

SN - 0019-8676

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 291987577